Is a relational ontology possible without a personal God? To accept a relational ontology within a naturalistic framework debases a persons capacity for personal experiences like thought and belief for example without the correspondent existence of a transcendent personality. And furthermore, that this transcendent personality is readily accessible to us and actively in relation with our being. Is this a type of ontological proof on the basis of relational ontology.[^1] Can the Incarnation (i.e. Christology) be used as a litmus text against a variety of deisms: theism, pantheism, panentheism, etc? Do each of these forms of Deism say something first and foremost about the Incarnation? In this way, is a High Christology the legitimacy of pan(en)theistic approaches to God? This meaning, does a view of Christ as God in created Man, and further more, as the firstborn of Creation, necessitate a type of panentheism and the least?[^2] Simmon's concept of truth existing in a correlation between theology and science is thoughtful and helpful, but it may have some epistemological shortfalls.[^3] I understand what he is getting at by pushing "consonance" and "mutual interdependence" but the meaning of this is lost on me by his constant insistence on analogical and metaphorical meaning.[^4] These epistemological ideas concerning the interface between Science and Faith are more thoroughly treated by writers like Polkinghorne (*Reason and Reality*) and Torrance (*Theological Science* and *Space, Time and Incarnation*). Are there, then, God particles and also creation particles? And "God particles" exist in superposition to "created" particles? What is the actual concept here?[^5] To put the question another way, how precisely does the superposition of the immanent/economic Trinity, and the reality of quantum entanglement imply pan *en* theism? Where is the "God in creation" if he fundamentally exists in entanglement with it? How does God exist in NIODA with creation is two entangled particles exist on the same level?

[^1]: Ernst M. Simmons, *The Entangled Trinity: Quantum Physics and Theology* (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2014), 35f.

[^2]: Simmons, (2014), 48f.

[^3]: Simmons, (2014), 47.

[^4]: Ernst M. Simmons, “Quantum Perichoresis: Quantum Field Theory and the Trinity,” *Theology and Science* 4 (2006): 137–150, at 140f., 148.

[^5]: Simmons, (2014), 143
